Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Public moral and political philosophy debates • AI ethics, automation, decision-making • Democracy, voting, free speech • Globalisation, borders, immigration, identity, patriotism • Climate justice • Welfare, inequality, pay fairness • State and private morality • Sexual violence, harassment • Health incentives • University accessThis podcast brings Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel into conversation with live audiences to examine the moral and political thinking behind contested public issues. Using a Socratic, question-driven format, it invites participants to test their intuitions, offer reasons for their views, and confront trade-offs that underlie policy choices and cultural disputes.
Across the episodes, recurring themes include how new technologies should shape human life and decision-making, especially the ethical implications of artificial intelligence, automation, and algorithmic judgment in areas such as education, relationships, creative work, and employment. The show also frequently turns to core questions of democratic life: what democracy requires beyond formal procedures, why participation matters, and how disagreement can be handled in pluralistic societies, including debates about free speech and its limits.
Questions of membership and identity appear prominently, with discussions of borders, immigration, citizenship, globalisation, patriotism, and whether social solidarity is being weakened by inequality and economic change. The podcast also addresses moral responsibility across time and communities, including what present-day citizens may owe in response to historical wrongdoing. Public policy dilemmas are explored through ethical lenses as well, from welfare and healthcare to incentives for healthy behaviour, the fairness of pay, and the justice of admissions preferences aimed at expanding educational opportunity.
Throughout, the emphasis is on clarifying concepts—fairness, rights, responsibility, the common good—and showing how philosophical arguments illuminate contemporary controversies.
| Episodes: |
|
The Ethics of AI 2024-Jun-11 42 minutes |
|
Will AI make thinking obsolete? 2019-Aug-26 41 minutes |
|
Public Philosopher - Citizens of Nowhere? 2018-Oct-29 41 minutes |
|
Global Philosopher: Should there be any limits to free speech? 2018-Feb-06 41 minutes |
|
Would life be better if robots did all the work? 2017-Mar-08 41 minutes |
|
The Global Philosopher: Should the Rich World Pay for Climate Change? 2016-Jul-28 41 minutes |
|
The Global Philosopher: Should Borders Matter? 2016-Mar-29 41 minutes |
|
Why Democracy? 2015-Jan-20 52 minutes |
|
National Guilt 2014-May-27 41 minutes |
|
Why Vote? 2014-May-20 41 minutes |
|
Morality and the State 2014-May-13 41 minutes |
|
Is rape worse than other violent crime? 2013-Mar-26 38 minutes |
|
Welfare 2012-Oct-30 42 minutes |
|
Immigration 2012-Oct-23 41 minutes |
|
Should we bribe people to be healthy? 2012-Apr-17 41 minutes |
|
Should a banker be paid more than a nurse? 2012-Apr-10 41 minutes |
|
Should universities give preference to applicants from poor backgrounds? 2012-Apr-03 41 minutes |