Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel examines the thinking behind a current controversy.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Public moral philosophy debates • AI and automation ethics • democracy, voting, free speech limits • globalisation, inequality, welfare • immigration, borders, citizenship • climate responsibility • state and private morality • justice, national guilt, sexual violence • fairness in pay, health incentives, education accessThis podcast features Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel in live, audience-driven discussions that use moral and political philosophy to probe the ideas behind contemporary controversies. Across the episodes, Sandel takes familiar headlines and everyday dilemmas—often framed as “should we?” questions—and uses them to examine competing values such as fairness, responsibility, rights, and the common good. The format emphasizes Socratic dialogue: participants are invited to take positions, defend them, and reconsider their assumptions as the conversation unfolds.
A major theme is how emerging technologies reshape human agency and judgment, including the ethical implications of artificial intelligence, automation, and algorithmic decision-making in domains like education, relationships, and creative work. The podcast also repeatedly turns to democratic life and civic identity, exploring why participation matters, what democracy requires beyond voting, and how globalization, inequality, and national belonging affect social cohesion. Questions about borders and migration connect to broader debates over national identity, citizenship, and obligations to outsiders.
Several episodes focus on justice and public policy, asking what counts as fair pay, what society owes through welfare and healthcare, and whether governments should influence private morality. The show also addresses contentious issues around speech and harm, including the limits of free expression and how societies should respond to serious violence and sexual wrongdoing. International perspectives are built in through audiences from different countries and global discussions, highlighting how moral disagreements play out across cultures and political contexts.
| Episodes: |
|
The Ethics of AI 2024-Jun-11 42 minutes |
|
Will AI make thinking obsolete? 2019-Aug-26 41 minutes |
|
Public Philosopher - Citizens of Nowhere? 2018-Oct-29 41 minutes |
|
Global Philosopher: Should there be any limits to free speech? 2018-Feb-06 41 minutes |
|
Would life be better if robots did all the work? 2017-Mar-08 41 minutes |
|
The Global Philosopher: Should the Rich World Pay for Climate Change? 2016-Jul-28 41 minutes |
|
The Global Philosopher: Should Borders Matter? 2016-Mar-29 41 minutes |
|
Why Democracy? 2015-Jan-20 52 minutes |
|
National Guilt 2014-May-27 41 minutes |
|
Why Vote? 2014-May-20 41 minutes |
|
Morality and the State 2014-May-13 41 minutes |
|
Is rape worse than other violent crime? 2013-Mar-26 38 minutes |
|
Welfare 2012-Oct-30 42 minutes |
|
Immigration 2012-Oct-23 41 minutes |
|
Should we bribe people to be healthy? 2012-Apr-17 41 minutes |
|
Should a banker be paid more than a nurse? 2012-Apr-10 41 minutes |
|
Should universities give preference to applicants from poor backgrounds? 2012-Apr-03 41 minutes |