Description (podcaster-provided):
Although what constitutes justice may vary depending on culture or historical context, all forms of justice are built on a foundation of moral assumptions that include ideas about ethics, fairness and the law. Philosophers have often debated the nature of both morality and justice and their relationship with each other and in this collection we explore some of the most influential ideas on the topics from Kant to Bentham and investigate problems such as can inequalities be justified, provided they are to the benefit of the worst off?Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Justice and morality • Ethics and fairness • Law and philosophy • Kant, Bentham, Plato • Utilitarianism • Distributive justice • Libertarian theories • Debates on law and moralityThis podcast delves into the philosophical exploration of justice and morality, engaging with classic and modern debates surrounding these themes. At its core, the podcast examines how various philosophers have articulated their views on justice and morality, as well as the intricate relationship between these concepts. The discussions are anchored in the moral assumptions underlying different forms of justice, encompassing ethics, fairness, and the law.
The podcast covers a wide array of philosophical perspectives, from ancient to contemporary thought. It includes debates on whether citizens obey laws due to inherent goodness or fear of punishment, drawing on themes from Greek philosophy. Utilitarian approaches are explored, distinguishing between classical and modern interpretations, indicating a temporal breadth in philosophical inquiry.
The exploration extends to Kantian moral philosophy, where the focus is on duty-based ethics, offering listeners insights into the deontological perspective. In contrast, the podcast also addresses theories of distributive justice, particularly through John Rawls' ideas, advocating for a society free from bias and inequalities. This is juxtaposed with libertarian views, such as those of Robert Nozick, which question state interventions like taxation, positing them as akin to coerced labor.
Throughout, the podcast emphasizes the philosophical debate on whether inequalities can be justified if they benefit the least advantaged, reflecting complex ethical considerations. By continuously navigating through these diverse philosophical landscapes, the podcast presents listeners with a comprehensive exploration of justice's multifaceted nature and its moral underpinnings. This serves as an intellectual space to ponder fundamental questions about how societies construct and justify their notions of fairness and equity.
Episodes: |
Plato on justice and self interest 2011-Jun-13 17 minutes |
Transcript -- Plato on justice and self interest 2011-Jun-13 |
Classical and modern utilitarianism 2011-Jun-13 17 minutes |
Transcript -- Classical and modern utilitarianism 2011-Jun-13 |
Kant's moral philosophy 2011-Jun-13 13 minutes |
Transcript -- Kant's moral philosophy 2011-Jun-13 |
Rawls on distributive justice 2011-Jun-13 8 minutes |
Transcript -- Rawls on distributive justice 2011-Jun-13 |
Nozick on Libertarian theories of justice 2011-Jun-13 7 minutes |
Transcript -- Nozick on Libertarian theories of justice 2011-Jun-13 |