Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Although what constitutes justice may vary depending on culture or historical context, all forms of justice are built on a foundation of moral assumptions that include ideas about ethics, fairness and the law. Philosophers have often debated the nature of both morality and justice and their relationship with each other and in this collection we explore some of the most influential ideas on the topics from Kant to Bentham and investigate problems such as can inequalities be justified, provided they are to the benefit of the worst off?Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Justice and morality • Ethics and fairness • Kant, Rawls, Nozick • Classical and modern utilitarianism • Law and self-interest • Distributive justice • Libertarian justice • Philosophical debatesThis podcast delves into the complex relationship between justice and morality, examining these concepts through the lens of philosophical debate and analysis. Grounded in moral assumptions that interweave ethics, fairness, and law, the episodes collectively explore how varying interpretations of justice can be shaped by cultural and historical contexts.
Focusing on influential philosophical voices such as Kant, Plato, Bentham, Rawls, and Nozick, the podcast tackles fundamental questions surrounding justice and morality. The discussions address whether citizens comply with laws due to genuine moral conviction or out of fear of punishment, thereby examining the intersection of justice with self-interest. Kant's moral philosophy is scrutinized, emphasizing his teachings on the nature of ethical behavior.
Utilitarianism, both classical and modern, is another focal point, where the podcast contrasts these frameworks in their approach to maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering. The differences highlight how utilitarian principles have evolved over time to address contemporary ethical dilemmas.
In terms of distributive justice, the podcast explores Rawls' theories, advocating for a society that seeks to eliminate bias and promote fairness across various dimensions, challenging even the concept of natural talent. Conversely, Nozick's libertarian views are presented, where taxation is critically compared to forced labor, raising questions about the role of government and individual freedom.
Overall, this podcast offers an in-depth exploration of philosophical theories on justice and morality, encouraging listeners to reflect on the ethical foundations of laws and social systems. Through a series of thought-provoking discussions, it encourages a deeper understanding of how philosophical ideas inform both historical and current perspectives on justice.
| Episodes: |
|
Plato on justice and self interest 2011-Jun-13 17 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Plato on justice and self interest 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Classical and modern utilitarianism 2011-Jun-13 17 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Classical and modern utilitarianism 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Kant's moral philosophy 2011-Jun-13 13 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Kant's moral philosophy 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Rawls on distributive justice 2011-Jun-13 8 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Rawls on distributive justice 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Nozick on Libertarian theories of justice 2011-Jun-13 7 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Nozick on Libertarian theories of justice 2011-Jun-13 |