Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Although what constitutes justice may vary depending on culture or historical context, all forms of justice are built on a foundation of moral assumptions that include ideas about ethics, fairness and the law. Philosophers have often debated the nature of both morality and justice and their relationship with each other and in this collection we explore some of the most influential ideas on the topics from Kant to Bentham and investigate problems such as can inequalities be justified, provided they are to the benefit of the worst off?Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Justice and morality • Ethical foundations • Law and fairness • Philosophical debates • Kant's morality • Utilitarianism • Rawls's distributive justice • Nozick's libertarian justice • Plato's justice and self-interestThis podcast, titled "Philosophy: Justice and Morality - Audio," delves into the intricate relationship between justice and morality, exploring these concepts from various philosophical perspectives. With a foundation rooted in moral assumptions encompassing ethics, fairness, and the law, the series invites listeners to examine how different philosophical frameworks address justice's complexities.
Through the lens of well-known philosophers, the podcast scrutinizes both historical and contemporary ideas. It explores debates around human motivation concerning law adherence, investigating whether citizens act out of goodwill or fear of consequences. The episodes compare classical and modern utilitarianism, illuminating the evolution of utilitarian thought and its implications for moral philosophy.
The series also examines the contributions of seminal thinkers like Kant, providing a deep dive into his moral philosophy and its enduring influence. Considerations of distributive justice emerge through the ideas of Rawls, who advocates for a society that minimizes biases, including those related to talent. Contrasting this, Nozick's libertarian view presents provocative claims about taxation, equating it to forced labor, thus challenging conventional notions of justice.
By exploring these diverse philosophical arguments, the podcast aims to unravel the varied interpretations of justice across different schools of thought. Listeners are encouraged to contemplate whether inequalities can ever be justified, especially if they benefit society's least advantaged members. Overall, the podcast offers a comprehensive exploration of justice and morality's philosophical underpinnings, facilitating a deeper understanding of these enduring human concerns.
| Episodes: |
|
Plato on justice and self interest 2011-Jun-13 17 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Plato on justice and self interest 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Classical and modern utilitarianism 2011-Jun-13 17 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Classical and modern utilitarianism 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Kant's moral philosophy 2011-Jun-13 13 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Kant's moral philosophy 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Rawls on distributive justice 2011-Jun-13 8 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Rawls on distributive justice 2011-Jun-13 |
|
Nozick on Libertarian theories of justice 2011-Jun-13 7 minutes |
|
Transcript -- Nozick on Libertarian theories of justice 2011-Jun-13 |