Description (podcaster-provided):
The podcast where we question existing norms in medicine, science, and public health.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Ethics in medicine and science • Moral philosophy in healthcare • Bioethical dilemmas • Decision-making in health policy • Genetic ethics • End-of-life care • Research oversight • Resource allocationThis podcast, titled "Bio(un)ethical," delves into the exploration of ethical questions at the intersection of medicine, science, and public health. The episodes feature discussions with various experts such as philosophers, bioethicists, and medical professionals who provide insight into controversial and emerging ethical dilemmas. The podcast probes the norms that govern practices in these fields, reflecting on whether they should be upheld, reconsidered, or reformed.
A recurring theme throughout the episodes is the ethical implications of scientific and medical advancements. Episodes cover topics such as genetic editing in children, the use of race in medical algorithms, and the ethical considerations of resource allocation during a pandemic. The podcast also tackles the moral responsibilities of healthcare professionals, ethical decision-making in public health policies, and the potential overprotection of children involved in research studies.
Another significant focus is the societal and moral norms that influence healthcare and related policies. Conversations address whether laypeople should be involved in health policy decisions and discuss how social contexts shape moral norms. Additionally, the ethical aspects of end-of-life care and whether some medical practices align with patient values are examined, highlighting broader questions about the balance between patient autonomy and medical authority.
Listeners can expect in-depth, analytical discussions questioning existing ethical frameworks and considering the complexities introduced by modern scientific capabilities. This podcast provides a platform for examining how empirical findings and philosophical reasoning intersect and influence moral judgments within the healthcare domain. Ultimately, "Bio(un)ethical" seeks to inform and provoke thought around the intricacies of ethical decision-making in today's rapidly advancing medical landscape.
Episodes: |
#16 Quayshawn Spencer: What is race? 2025-Jan-14 102 minutes |
#15 Jeff McMahan: On the ethics of choosing our children's genes 2024-Dec-17 87 minutes |
#14 James Diao: When should race be used in medical algorithms? 2024-Dec-10 87 minutes |
#13 Sarah McGrath: Are there moral experts? 2024-Nov-27 78 minutes |
#12 David Wendler: Are we overprotecting kids in research? 2024-Nov-12 105 minutes |
#11 Richard Leiter: Is a better death possible? 2024-Oct-29 88 minutes |
#10 Danielle Allen: Should laypeople make health policy decisions? 2024-Jan-16 58 minutes |
#9 Marc Lipsitch: How to ethically prevent the next pandemic 2024-Jan-02 61 minutes |
#8 Sally Haslanger: How social contexts shape our moral norms 2023-Dec-12 85 minutes |
#7 Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby: Is nudging ethically required? 2023-Nov-14 69 minutes |
#6 Jeff Sebo: Why we’re wrong about who matters 2023-Oct-31 85 minutes |
#5 Chris Robichaud: Can we teach people to be more ethical? 2023-Oct-17 71 minutes |
#4 Holly Fernandez Lynch: Do IRBs do more good than harm? 2023-Oct-03 81 minutes |
#3 Marie Nicolini: Should people with mental illness have access to medical aid in dying? 2023-Sep-19 78 minutes |
#2 Govind Persad: How (not) to allocate resources during a pandemic 2023-Sep-05 79 minutes |
#1 Robert Steel: Can research be too risky? 2023-Aug-21 78 minutes |
#0 Welcome to Bio(un)ethical 2023-Aug-17 21 minutes |