Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
BJPS articles, but shorter. Also louder.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Philosophy of science and epistemology • scientific explanation, inference, models, realism • probability, Bayesian decision-making under uncertainty • physics foundations: quantum, black holes, time’s arrow • social epistemology, peer review, funding fairness • mind-reading, computation, biology/medicine conceptsThis podcast presents short, read-aloud versions of essays that sit at the intersection of philosophy and the sciences. Across the episodes, contributors use specific scientific case studies—ranging from physics and cosmology to biology, cognitive science, medicine, economics, and data-driven humanities—to examine how we should understand explanation, evidence, and scientific knowledge.
A recurring focus is philosophy of science in practice: how models represent the world, when idealizations or parameter “tuning” are epistemically acceptable, and what counts as a good explanation. Several discussions probe major metaphysical and interpretive questions raised by contemporary physics, including issues about realism and objectivity in quantum theory, the nature of laws versus initial conditions, and how to think about forces, fields, time’s arrow, and puzzles involving indistinguishable particles. Other episodes turn to scientific measurement and formal reasoning, asking how to evaluate probabilistic beliefs, whether coherence and accuracy can both be demanded of limited agents, and how decision-making changes under severe uncertainty or imprecise probabilities.
The podcast also treats science as a social and institutional enterprise. It examines how funding and peer review might be structured, how biases and selection mechanisms shape outcomes, and whether conventional notions of authorship obscure the division of labor in research. Related themes in social epistemology include trust in science and inference under real-world pressures, including pandemic contexts.
In the life and mind sciences, episodes explore questions about explanation and function in biology, the role of history versus mechanism, and how cognitive capacities such as “mind-reading” might be accounted for. There is also attention to psychiatry and medicine, including critiques of reductionism and debates about how to draw boundaries between health and pathology. Some entries foreground how scientific categories are constructed—such as the treatment of sex as binary—and what is at stake when complex individuals are forced into simplified variables. Overall, the series offers compact, argument-driven reflections on how science works, what its theories mean, and how its methods and institutions shape knowledge.
