Description (podcaster-provided):
Go behind the scenes with philosophers and cognitive scientists to get their take on published journal articles, what they like about papers, what they maybe don't anymore, and where inquiry should take us next.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Philosophical insights • Legal analysis • Moral psychology • Cognitive science • Ethics and epistemology • Neuroscience and technology • Social issues • Conceptual analysisThis podcast, titled "Journal Entries," delves into the intersections of philosophy, cognitive science, and contemporary issues through in-depth discussions of academic papers. The show offers behind-the-scenes insights from philosophers and researchers, exploring both their appreciation and critiques of their work and the broader inquiries these topics raise.
The episodes cover a diverse range of topics. They discuss legal and ethical questions in international law, especially around hate speech and incitement, and delve into the intricate relationship between emotions like disgust and morality. Cognitive science insights are frequently explored, particularly in relation to belief, knowledge, and consciousness. Neuroscientific advancements and their ethical considerations also surface as prominent topics, particularly in understanding traumatic brain injuries. The role of statistical significance in scientific research and the complexities surrounding terms like "fake news" highlight issues in data interpretation and communication.
Philosophical inquiry into personal and social aspects forms another recurring theme, with episodes examining the morality of friendships with morally questionable people and the art of complaining. Feminist epistemology is also featured, as are discussions about the ontological status of absences as causes. The podcast sheds light on the evolving understandings of concepts like wisdom, agency, and introspection.
Collectively, the podcast episodes offer a blend of philosophical scholarship and cognitive science perspectives, encouraging listeners to contemplate how these fields influence and interact with societal challenges and personal experiences. The discussions aim to engage listeners in critical thinking about pressing moral, legal, and epistemological questions, offering a platform for reflective dialogue on the nature of human understanding and behavior.