Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Go behind the scenes with philosophers and cognitive scientists to get their take on published journal articles, what they like about papers, what they maybe don't anymore, and where inquiry should take us next.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Philosophical analysis • Cognitive science insights • Ethics • Morality • Legal implications • Neuroscience • Epistemology • Social norms • Human agency • Statistical significance • Fake news • Friendship • CausationThis podcast, titled "Journal Entries," delves into a rich tapestry of interdisciplinary discussions grounded in philosophy and cognitive science. Each episode features a deep dive into scholarly papers and research, bringing in experts to unpack complex ideas and current inquiries within their respective fields.
A recurring theme in this podcast is the exploration of morally and socially charged topics, such as the intersections of hate speech and legal incitement, including how such speech is prosecuted internationally. The nuanced debate around the role of disgust in moral judgment is also examined, considering whether this often negatively perceived emotion can serve as a fitting and constructive response to moral transgressions.
Issues surrounding human consciousness and brain injury are addressed through insights into neuroscientific advancements, highlighting the ethical dilemmas posed by new diagnostic technologies. The podcast also scrutinizes foundational cognitive science topics like theory of mind, examining whether knowledge or belief is the more primary cognitive function.
Philosophical debates around evidentialism and moral encroachment provide another layer of depth, discussing whether moral considerations can, or should, influence the justification of beliefs. The podcast also tackles the concept of wisdom, with researchers investigating its definition, measurement, and development across cultures.
Further episodes delve into the virtues of complaining, countering classical philosophical views that dismiss it, by suggesting that complaining can play a significant social and psychological role. Feminist epistemology and its claims about the social construction of knowledge feature prominently, as does the examination of games as a form of art that shapes human agency.
Notably, the podcast also critiques popular discourse on "fake news," arguing for a more nuanced understanding of these terms to avoid conceptual confusion. Finally, discussions about friendship with morally flawed individuals, and the metaphysics of causation and omissions, round out the diverse subject matter, reflecting ongoing scholarly dialogues aimed at unraveling the complex nature of human thought, behavior, and societal norms.