Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Welcome to the Upon Reflection podcast with Nick Byrd, a podcast about what we think as well as how and why we think it. Nick studies the philosophy of cognitive science and the cognitive science of philosophy. This podcast will share Nick's and others' research. For instance, the podcast will discuss the differences between intuition and reflection as well as the ways in which intuitive reasoning predicts different philosophical, moral, and religious judgments than reflective reasoning. The podcast will also discuss topics like implicit bias—e.g., contrary to what you may have heard, implicit bias may not be entirely unconscious and involuntary. If you want to hear more about this research, you can subscribe wherever you find podcasts. And if you end up enjoying the Upon Reflection podcast, then feel free to tell people about it, online, in person, or in your review.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Reflective and intuitive reasoning in philosophy • Cognitive science and psychology research • Moral dilemmas and implicit bias • Impact of reasoning on philosophical judgments • Academic publication readings"Upon Reflection" is a podcast hosted by Nick Byrd that delves into the intersections of philosophy and cognitive science, focusing on how and why we think in particular ways. The show is dedicated to exploring the philosophical aspects of cognitive science and vice versa. Through the podcast, Byrd shares his own research as well as collaborations with others, tackling a variety of topics that illustrate complex cognitive and philosophical concepts.
A central theme in the podcast is the distinction between intuitive and reflective reasoning. The episodes often explore how different modes of thinking influence philosophical, moral, and religious judgments. Byrd often discusses reflective reasoning, examining its role in philosophical inquiry and its consequential effects on judgment and decision-making.
The podcast also covers the study of implicit bias, suggesting that contrary to popular belief, implicit bias may not be wholly unconscious and involuntary. Byrd's work on topics like the "analytic atheism" correlation, moral dilemmas, and the philosophical underpinnings of public health compliance offers listeners insights into how deep-seated beliefs and cognitive processes shape real-world actions and societal norms.
Episodes frequently include readings from Byrd's published research papers, providing a scholarly approach to discussions on reflection, philosophy, and cognitive science. The podcast also collaborates with other researchers to explore broader philosophical questions, like free will, epistemic identity, and virtue in reflective reasoning.
With an interdisciplinary approach, "Upon Reflection" seeks to inform listeners about contemporary research in cognitive science and philosophy, often challenging common assumptions and offering new perspectives on age-old questions. This podcast is particularly informative for those interested in the academic intersection of philosophy and cognitive science, offering detailed insights into how cognitive processes affect various philosophical discourses.