Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Welcome to the Upon Reflection podcast with Nick Byrd, a podcast about what we think as well as how and why we think it. Nick studies the philosophy of cognitive science and the cognitive science of philosophy. This podcast will share Nick's and others' research. For instance, the podcast will discuss the differences between intuition and reflection as well as the ways in which intuitive reasoning predicts different philosophical, moral, and religious judgments than reflective reasoning. The podcast will also discuss topics like implicit bias—e.g., contrary to what you may have heard, implicit bias may not be entirely unconscious and involuntary. If you want to hear more about this research, you can subscribe wherever you find podcasts. And if you end up enjoying the Upon Reflection podcast, then feel free to tell people about it, online, in person, or in your review.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Cognitive science and philosophy • Reflective and intuitive reasoning • Moral dilemmas • Implicit bias • Philosophical judgments • Online conferences • Free will • Pandemic psychology • Personal identity • Well-beingUpon Reflection is a podcast hosted by Nick Byrd, focusing on the intersection of philosophy and cognitive science. The show delves into how and why we think, exploring themes such as intuition versus reflection, implicit bias, and their implications on philosophical, moral, and religious judgments. Throughout its episodes, the podcast presents both Byrd's and others' research, highlighting differences in thought processes and how these influence beliefs.
The content frequently addresses philosophical questions through the lens of cognitive science, discussing whether reflective reasoning is a virtue or skill and how it affects philosophical beliefs. Episodes explore empirical methods of measuring reflection, questioning traditional tests for reflective thinking, and critiquing their effectiveness. A recurring topic is implicit bias, challenging common perceptions by suggesting it may not be entirely unconscious. The discussions extend to contemporary debates about science communication and psychometrics.
Several episodes examine the effects of reflective versus intuitive reasoning on philosophical positions and judgments, often linking psychological factors and demographics to variations in philosophical views. The podcast also considers the practical application of these psychological insights to issues like moral dilemmas, public health compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic, and free will.
Listeners are encouraged to consider reflection's role in shaping our understanding of philosophy, morality, and even our personal identities. By exploring interdisciplinary connections, Upon Reflection aims to provide a comprehensive look at the cognitive mechanisms underlying philosophical thought and how these insights can inform both academic and personal perspectives.