Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Welcome to the Upon Reflection podcast with Nick Byrd, a podcast about what we think as well as how and why we think it. Nick studies the philosophy of cognitive science and the cognitive science of philosophy. This podcast will share Nick's and others' research. For instance, the podcast will discuss the differences between intuition and reflection as well as the ways in which intuitive reasoning predicts different philosophical, moral, and religious judgments than reflective reasoning. The podcast will also discuss topics like implicit bias—e.g., contrary to what you may have heard, implicit bias may not be entirely unconscious and involuntary. If you want to hear more about this research, you can subscribe wherever you find podcasts. And if you end up enjoying the Upon Reflection podcast, then feel free to tell people about it, online, in person, or in your review.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ Philosophy and cognitive science research • Intuition versus reflection • Implicit bias exploration • Reflective reasoning's influence • Moral dilemmas and free will • Academic and pandemic psychology • Diverse philosophical beliefsThe "Upon Reflection" podcast, hosted by Nick Byrd, explores the intersection of philosophy and cognitive science. The show's overarching theme revolves around examining what we think, as well as how and why we think it. This podcast delves into the nuanced differences between intuitive and reflective reasoning, frequently questioning how these modes of thinking influence various philosophical, moral, and religious judgments.
Each episode typically involves an in-depth look at specific research or scholarly papers. Topics span a wide range within the cognitive science and philosophy spheres, including reflective reasoning, implicit bias, and moral dilemmas. The podcast often cites academic thought experiments, such as the broken clock scenario, to illustrate points about knowledge and belief. It also evaluates the validity and implications of common cognitive tests like the Cognitive Reflection Test, questioning their ability to accurately measure reflective thinking.
A recurring area of exploration is the role of implicit bias, with discussions addressing its unconscious nature and the complexities of measuring it. The podcast also considers philosophical implications of cognitive science findings, such as how reflective reasoning affects philosophical beliefs and whether it plays a role in free will.
Interdisciplinary in nature, this podcast incorporates insights from cognitive scientists, philosophers, and psychologists. It offers a platform for discussing empirical research and its applications to real-world issues, such as public health compliance and educational practices. Sponsored segments in the episodes suggest collaborations with educational and tech companies, indicating a practical application focus. Overall, this podcast is aimed at those interested in understanding the cognitive processes behind philosophical reasoning and decision-making.