Site • RSS • Apple PodcastsDescription (podcaster-provided):
Cracking tales of historical mathematics and its interplay with science, philosophy, and culture. Revisionist history galore. Contrarian takes on received wisdom. Implications for teaching. Informed by current scholarship. By Dr Viktor Blåsjö.Themes and summary (AI-generated based on podcaster-provided show and episode descriptions):
➤ revisionist history of mathematics • Greek geometry/Euclid: axioms, proofs, constructions, diagrams, oral pedagogy • philosophy of geometry: Kant, rationalism vs empiricism, innateness • non-Euclidean geometry • astronomy/physics historiography: Archimedes, Copernicus/Islamic models, Galileo critiques, relativity operationalismThis podcast explores the history of mathematics by using well-known problems, texts, and historical figures as entry points into broader questions about how mathematical knowledge is created, justified, transmitted, and later remembered. Across its episodes, it treats mathematics not just as a sequence of results but as a cultural and philosophical practice shaped by institutions, technologies, and intellectual fashions. A recurring feature is historiographical skepticism: familiar “standard stories” are interrogated, alternative interpretations are developed, and modern myths about past discoveries are compared with what surviving sources and current scholarship can actually support.
A substantial portion of the content centers on Greek mathematics and geometry, especially Euclid and the development of proof. The discussions emphasize how definitions, postulates, constructions, and diagrams functioned as tools for reasoning, and how the style of mathematical writing may reflect oral teaching practices. From there the podcast connects foundational questions—such as what makes an axiom legitimate, whether geometry is grounded in intuition or experience, and how far deduction can be reduced to logic—to later philosophical debates in antiquity and early modern Europe.
The show also examines how geometry’s meaning changed when non-Euclidean systems emerged, and how thinkers such as Kant and Poincaré approached the relationship between mathematical structures and physical space, including the possibility that aspects of spatial reasoning are innate or shaped by experience. In parallel, it treats episodes from the history of astronomy and physics as case studies in intellectual transmission and priority disputes, including questions about influence between Islamic and European astronomers and the evidential status of observational claims.
Another through-line is reassessing scientific reputations. The podcast frequently contrasts popular heroic narratives with accounts that foreground technical competence, methodological standards, and disciplinary perspectives—especially the differing values of mathematicians, philosophers, and broader cultural audiences. Overall, the series uses pointed historical arguments to link mathematical ideas with their surrounding scientific, philosophical, and social contexts, and to draw implications for how history influences contemporary views of mathematics and its teaching.
